4.6 Article

Preparation, characterization and fluorimetric studies of novel photoactive poly(amide-imide) from 1-naphthaldehyde and 2,6-diaminopyridine by microwave-irradiation

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2007.01.004

关键词

poly(amide-imide); polycondensation; photoactive polymer; microwave irradiation; fluorimetric studies

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Trimellitic anhydride acid chloride (2) was obtained by the reaction of trimellitic anhydride (1) and excess amount of thionyl chloride. The acid chloride was reacted with 2,6-diamino pyridine (3), and produced the monomer 4. 1-Naphthaldehyde (5) was reacted with sulfuryl chloride to produce 1-naphthoyl chloride (6) in a quantitative yield. Through the reaction of 6 and 1,3,5-triazine-2,4,6-triamine (7), the monomer 8 was produced in high yield. Two monomers were characterized by H-1 NMR and FT-IR spectroscopy, and then were used in the polymerization reaction. A new facile and rapid polycondensation reaction of the two monomers was performed by using a domestic microwave oven. The polymerization reaction proceeded rapidly, compared with the conventional solution polycondensation and was completed within 8 min, producing a photoactive poly(amide-imide) in a quantitative yield. The resulting polymer was characterized by IR, H-1 NMR and thermal gravimetric analysis (TGA) techniques. Thermogravimetric analysis indicated that polymer 9 was thermally stable in nitrogen atmosphere. In addition the initial decomposition temperature (IDT), 5 and 10% weight loss (T-5, T-10) were 265.85 and 292.85 degrees C. The residual weight percent at 500 degrees C was 50%, which shows it is moderately thermally stable. Fluorescence properties of polymer 9 were investigated in several solvents. The ideal concentration of each case was determined by fluorescence self-quenching phenomena. Also the self-quenching mechanism was studied according to the specific behavior of the polymer in different solvents. (c) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据