4.8 Article

Upconversion Fluorescent Aptasensor for Polychlorinated Biphenyls Detection Based on Nicking Endonuclease and Hybridization Chain Reaction Dual-Amplification Strategy

期刊

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 90, 期 16, 页码 9936-9942

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.8b02159

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81602896, 81502847, 21477162]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program [2017YFF0104903, 2017YFC1200903]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel upconversion fluorescent aptasensor based on hybridization chain reaction and nicking endonuclease has been developed for detection of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). It combined the dual advantages of UCNPs and HCR Two harpins (H1 and H2) were first designed according to the partial complementary sequence (cDNA) of the PCB72/106. Since the aptamer specifically recognized the target, the cDNA was detached from the magnetic microspheres (MMPs). The cDNA could initiate hybridization chain reaction (HCR) and open the stems of H1 and H2. After the addition of nicking endonuclease, UCNPs were further away from the quenchers (BHQ-1). Hence, the fluorescence intensity of upconversion nano-particals (UCNPs) could be restored via fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET). Therefore, the fluorescence of UCNPs was directly proportional to concentration of PCB72/106, which was the basis for the quantification of PCB72/106. PCB72/106 could be analyzed within the ranges of 0.004 to 800 ng/mL with a detection limit of 0.0035 ng/mL (S/N = 3). The aptasensor was also used for the detection of water and soil samples, and the average recoveries ranged from 93.4% to 109.7% and 83.2% to 118.5%, respectively. The relative standard deviations (RSDs) were all below 3.2%. The signal was first amplified through HCR and further amplified with the help of nicking endonuclease. This work also provided the opportunity to develop fluorescent aptasensors for other targets using this dual-amplification strategy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据