4.4 Article

Continuous nucleocytoplasmic shuttling underlies transcriptional activation of PPARγ by FABP4

期刊

BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 46, 期 23, 页码 6744-6752

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/bi700047a

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [T32-DK715827, R01 DK60684] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

FABP4 delivers specific ligands from the cytosol to the nuclear receptor PPAR gamma in the nucleus, thereby facilitating the ligation and enhancing the transcriptional activity of the receptor. Here, we delineate the structural features that underlie the nucleocytoplasmic transport of FABP4. The primary sequence of FABP4 does not harbor a readily identifiable nuclear localization signal (NLS). However, such a signal could be found in the three-dimensional structure of the protein and was mapped to three basic residues that form a functional NLS stabilized by the FABP4/PPAR gamma ligand troglitazone. We show that FABP4 is also subject to active nuclear export. Similarly to the NLS, the nuclear export signal (NES) is not apparent in the primary sequence, but assembles in the tertiary structure from three nonadjacent leucine residues to form a motif reminiscent of established NES. The data demonstrate that both nuclear export and nuclear import are critical for enabling FABP4 to enhance the transcriptional activity of PPAR gamma. Additionally, the observations provide insight into the fundamental question of how proteins are activated by ligands. Such an activation may be understood by the induced-fit model, which states that ligand-induced conformational changes precede activation of a protein. Alternatively, the pre-existing equilibrium hypothesis postulates that activated conformations exist within the repertoire of apoproteins, and that ligands do not induce these but merely stabilize them. Studies of the subcellular localization of FABP4 support the validity of the pre-existing equilibrium model for the ligand-controlled activation of the nuclear import of FABP4.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据