4.7 Article

X-monosomy effects on visuospatial attention in mice: A candidate gene and implications for turner syndrome and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder

期刊

BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY
卷 61, 期 12, 页码 1351-1360

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.08.011

关键词

5-choice serial reaction time task; dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate; discriminative response accuracy; steroid sulfatase; X chromosome; Y-*X chromosome

资金

  1. MRC [MC_U117532009] Funding Source: UKRI
  2. Medical Research Council [MC_U117532009] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. Medical Research Council [MC_U117532009] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The loss of all, or part of an X chromosome, in Turner syndrome (TS, 45,XO) results in deficits in attentional functioning. Methods: Using a 39,XO mouse model, we tested the hypothesis that X-monosomy and/or parental origin of the single X chromosome may influence visuospatial attentional functioning in a 5-choice serial reaction time task (5-CSRTT). Results: Under attentionally demanding conditions 39,XO mice displayed impaired discriminative response accuracy and slowed correct reaction times relative to 40,XX mice;these deficits were alleviated in a version of the task with reduced attentional demands. Parental origin of the X did not affect performance of the 5-CSRTT. In contrast, the attentional phenotype was rescued in 40,XY*(x) mice possessing a single maternally inherited X chromosome and a small Y*(x) chromosome that comprises a complete pseudoautosomal region (PAR), and a small X-specific segment. Conclusions: Our findings are consistent with an X-monosomy effect on attention and suggest the existence of X-linked gene(s) that escape X-inactivation, are present on the small Y*(x)chromosome and impact on attentional functioning;the strongest candidate gene is Sts, encoding steroid sulfatase. The data inform the TS literature and indicate novel genetic mechanisms that may be of general significance to the neurobiology of attention.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据