4.7 Article

Chronic asthma-induced airway remodeling is prevented by toll-like receptor-7/8 ligand S28463

期刊

出版社

AMER THORACIC SOC
DOI: 10.1164/rccm.200701-054OC

关键词

resiquimod; R-848; imidazoquinoline; airway remodeling; toll-like receptor

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rationale: Allergic asthma is a heterogeneous disease, the pathology of which is a result of improper immune responses to innocuous antigens. We and others have previously shown that one of the Toll-like receptor (TLR)-7/8 ligands, the synthetic compound 528463 (resiquimod, R-848), is able to inhibit acute allergic asthma in mice. Objectives: Given that the efficiency of this pharmacologic compound against the smooth muscle mass increase and goblet cell hyperplasia that are characteristic of chronic allergic asthma has not been previously assessed, we investigated the ability of this compound to prevent these aspects of chronic airway remodeling. Methods: The impact of S28463 treatment was assessed in a Brown Norway rat model of chronic asthma by histologic, morphometric, and molecular techniques. Measurements and Main Results: We demonstrate that treatment with S28463 is able to prevent the development of goblet cell hyperplasia and increases in airway smooth muscle mass, and that this effect is at least partially mediated by inhibiting proliferation of goblet and smooth muscle cells, respectively. Furthermore, we show that the abrogation of airway remodeling is preceded by inhibition of the inflammatory reaction normally occurring in response to allergen challenge in sensitized animals. This inhibition was associated with a reduction of both helper T cell type I and type 2 cytokine protein expression in the lungs, demonstrating the potent antiinflammatory effect of this pharmaceutical compound in the context of allergic reactions. Conclusions: Taken together, our results indicate great potential for the use of S28463 as an antiinflammatory therapeutic agent for the management of chronic asthma.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据