4.8 Article

Targeted Quantification of C-Reactive Protein and Cystatin C and Its Variants by Immuno-MALDI-MS

期刊

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 86, 期 12, 页码 5807-5814

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ac500704y

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The most common technologies for quantitative determination of protein biomarkers are immunoassays, which exist in various formats. Immunoassays offer sensitive and fast protein quantification, but can hardly discriminate between protein variants. Post-translational modifications and genetic variants increase protein microheterogeneity and may play important roles in biological processes. Mass spectrometry combined with immunoaffinity enrichment detects protein microheterogeneity and can quantify different iso-forms. We here present an immuno-MALDI-MS approach for the combined quantification of two important biomarkers of inflammation and renal function, C-reactive protein (CRP) and cystatin C, respectively. Antibodies were immobilized onto reversed-phase tips, which allows easy and flexible sample processing. Quantification was performed in singleplex and duplex assays, and characteristics were evaluated for different internal standards, i.e., PEGylated and polyhistidine-tagged proteins. The best performances were obtained for polyhistidine-tagged standards with respect to limits of detection (CRP, 0.10 mu g/mL; cystatin C, 0.003 mu g/mL) and coefficients of variation (CRP, 2.4-7.0%; cystatin C, 3.0-8.9%). The methods were benchmarked against immunoturbidimetry and nephelometry and demonstrated good between-assay agreement (R-2 = 0.989 for CRP; R-2 = 0.939 for cystatin C). Several variants of cystatin C were identified and quantified, while none were observed for CRP. This immuno-MALDI method describes a novel approach for targeted quantitative investigation of protein microheterogeneity and is well suited for assessment of biomarker status in precious samples from biobanks due to its low sample consumption.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据