4.8 Article

MALDI MS In-Source Decay of Glycans Using a Glutathione-Capped Iron Oxide Nanoparticle Matrix

期刊

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 86, 期 16, 页码 8496-8503

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ac502422a

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [DMR-0907204, DMR-1149931]
  2. College Academy of Research, Scholarship and Creative Activity (CARSCA)
  3. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  4. Division Of Materials Research [1149931] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  5. Division Of Materials Research
  6. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [0907204] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A new matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization (MALDI) mass spectrometry matrix is proposed for molecular mass and structural determination of glycans. This matrix contains an iron oxide nanoparticle (NP) core with gluthathione (GSH) molecules covalently bound to the surface. As demonstrated for the monosaccharide glucose and several larger glycans, the mass spectra exhibit good analyte ion intensities and signal-to-noise ratios, as well as an exceptionally clean background in the low mass-to-charge (m/z) region. In addition, abundant in-source decay (ISD) occurs when the laser power is increased above the ionization threshold; this indicates that the matrix provides strong energy transfer to the sample. For five model glycans, ISD produced extensive glycosidic and cross-ring cleavages in the positive ion mode from singly charged precursor ions with bound sodium ions. Linear, branched, and cyclic glycans were employed, and all were found to undergo abundant fragmentation by ISD. O-18 labeling was used to clarify m/z assignment ambiguities and showed that the majority of the fragmentation originates from the nonreducing ends of the glycans. Studies with a peracetylated glycan indicated that abundant ISD fragmentation occurs even in the absence of hydroxyl groups. The ISD product ions generated using this new matrix should prove useful in the sequencing of glycans.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据