4.6 Article

Regional FMRP deficits and large repeat expansions into the full mutation range in a new Fragile X permutation mouse model

期刊

GENE
卷 395, 期 1-2, 页码 125-134

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.gene.2007.02.026

关键词

repeat expansion; DNA instability; full mutation

资金

  1. Intramural NIH HHS [Z01 DK057602-11] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Carriers of FMR1 alleles with 55-200 repeats in the 5'UTR are at risk for Fragile X associated tremor and ataxia syndrome. The cause of the neuropathology is unknown but is thought to be RNA-mediated. Maternally transmitted premutation alleles are also at risk of expansion of the repeat tract into the full mutation range (>200 repeats). The mechanism responsible for expansion is unknown. Full inutation alleles produce reduced amounts of the FMR I gene product, FMRP, which leads to Fragile X mental retardation syndrome. We have developed a murine model for Fragile X premutation carriers that recapitulates key features seen in humans including a direct relationship between repeat number and Fmr1 mRNA levels, an inverse relationship with FMRP levels and Purkinje cell dropout that have not been seen in a previously described knock-in mouse model. In addition, these mice also show a differential deficit of FMRP in different parts of the brain that might account for symptoms of the full mutation that are seen in premutation carriers. As in humans, repeat instability is high with expansions predominating and, for the first time in a mouse model, large expansions into the full mutation range are seen that occur within a single generation. Thus, contrary to what was previously thought, mice may be good models not only for the symptoms seen in human carriers of FMR1 premutation alleles but also for understanding the mechanism responsible for repeat expansion, a phenomenon that is responsible for a number of neurological and neurodevelopmental disorders. (c) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据