4.6 Article

Rheological and electrical properties of bentonite in anionic polystyrene sulfonate and nortionic poly(vinyl alcohol)

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED POLYMER SCIENCE
卷 104, 期 6, 页码 3886-3894

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/app.26005

关键词

additives; clay; colloids; density; polystyrene; rheology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The flow properties of bentonite were studied with a combination of anionic polystyrene sulfonate (molecular weight = 70,000 g/mol) and nonionic poly(vinyl alcohol) (molecular weight = 50,000 g/mol). This combination had a significant effect on clay suspensions depending on the sequence of the polymer addition. The addition of 50 mg/L anionic polystyrene sulfonate followed by 200 mg/L nonionic poly(vinyl alcohol) improved the rheological properties with a 7% bentonite suspension, especially at 20 degrees C and after 24 h of aging. However, by the reversal of this addition sequence, the rheological properties of bentonite suspensions were reduced. The potential of bentonite suspensions of the individual polymers at the same concentration was -42 mV for polystyrene sulfonate and -63 mV for poly(vinyl alcohol). The combined effect of anionic polystyrene sulfonate followed by nonionic poly(vinyl alcohol) noticeably changed the C potential (-95 mV). With the reversal of the addition sequence, this parameter did not change. Potential energy profiles were constructed to investigate the suspension stability. Potential energy profiles of polystyrene sulfonate added to bentonite suspensions and followed by poly(vinyl alcohol) produced high repulsion potential energy between clay surfaces, reflecting high suspension stability. By the reversal of this sequence, a significant reduction of the energy barrier was observed. On the basis of the rheological and electrical properties of this system, the addition of polystyrene sulfonate followed by poly(vinyl alcohol) provides a promising tendency for a 7% clay concentration to meet desirable drilling mud properties. (C) 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据