4.6 Article

Protein kinase Cδ regulates antigen receptor-induced lytic granule polarization in mouse CD8+ CTL

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 178, 期 12, 页码 7814-7821

出版社

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.178.12.7814

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [F32 CA101449, R01 CA108573, R01 CA 108573, F32 CA 101449-02] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIAID NIH HHS [R01 AI041573, R01 AI 41573, R01 AI 48837, R01 AI048837] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lytic granule exocytosis is the major pathway used by CD8(+) CTL to kill virally infected and tumor cells. Despite the obvious importance, of this pathway in adaptive T cell immunity, the molecular identity of enzymes involved in the regulation of this process is poorly characterized. One signal known to be critical for the regulation of granule exocytosis-mediated cytotoxicity in CD8+ T cells is Ag receptor-induced activation of protein kinase C (PKC). However, it is not known which step of the process is regulated by PKC. In addition, it has not been determined to date which of the PKC family members is required for the regulation of lytic granule exocytosis. By combination of pharmacological inhibitors and use of mice with targeted gene deletions, we show that PKC delta is required for granule exocytosis-mediated lytic function in mouse CD8(+) T cells. Our studies demonstrate that PKC delta is required for lytic granule exocytosis, but is dispensable for activation, cytokine production, and expression of cytolytic molecules in response to TCR stimulation. Importantly, defective lytic function in PKC delta-deficient cytotoxic lymphocytes is reversed by ectopic expression of PKC delta. Finally, we show that PKC delta is not involved in target cell-induced reorientation of the microtubule-organizing center, but is required for the subsequent exocytosis step, i.e., lytic granule polarization. Thus, our studies identify PKC delta as a novel and selective regulator of Ag receptor-induced lytic granule polarization in mouse CD8+ T cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据