4.4 Article

Physiological responses of the seagrass Posidonia oceanica to elevated organic matter content in sediments:: An experimental assessment

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jembe.2006.12.020

关键词

ammonium; Anaerobiosis; organic enrichment; Posidonia oceanica seagrasses; sulphide

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Here we studied the effects of adding organic carbon and nutrients to sediment on the physiology and survival of the seagrass Posidonia oceanica in a field experiment in the Medes Islands (NE Spain). Nine randomly selected plots were established at a depth of 10 m; three were enriched with organic carbon (OM treatment), three with organic carbon and nutrients (OMN treatment), and three were kept as controls (CON). The experiment was performed over 5 months and sampling of plants and sediments was done in March, May and July 2002. Sediment sulfide pools and pore water ammonium concentrations increased significantly in OM and OMN plots, both treatments showing increased reducing conditions in the sediment. Plants in these two treatments showed higher mortality and lower biomass compared to plants from CON plots. The greatest effects on seagrass occurred in the OMN plots, indicating a synergistic effect of organic carbon and nutrient additions. Treatments had significant effects on plant nitrogen (N) and phosphorous (P) metabolism, shown by an increase in free amino acid (FAA) content, a change in FAA composition and a lack of increase in N and P tissue content. Treated plants showed higher g-aminobutyric acid (GABA) and malate concentrations and lower concentrations of non-structural carbohydrates compared to CON, indicating that anaerobic respiration in below-ground tissues occurred Several of the physiological changes shown by P. oceanica can be interpreted as adaptations to anoxia exposure. However, the increased mortality in treated plots demonstrates that this seagrass does not tolerate highly reduced sediments. (C) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据