4.8 Article

Proteogenomic Biomarkers for Identification of Francisella Species and Subspecies by Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization-Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry

期刊

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 86, 期 19, 页码 9394-9398

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ac501840g

关键词

-

资金

  1. Commissariat a l'Energie Atomique et aux Energies Alternatives
  2. Agence Nationale de la Recherche [ANR-11-SECU-0007]
  3. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-11-SECU-0007] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Francisella tularensis is the causative agent of tularemia. Because some Francisella strains are very virulent, this species is considered by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to be a potential category A bioweapon. A mass spectrometry method to quickly and robustly distinguish between virulent and nonvirulent Francisella strains is desirable. A combination of shotgun proteomics and whole-cell matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry on the Francisella tularensis subsp. holarctica LVS defined three protein biomarkers that allow such discrimination: the histone-like protein HU form B, the 10 kDa chaperonin Cpn10, and the 50S ribosomal protein L24. We established that their combined detection by whole-cell MALDI-TOF spectrum could enable (i) the identification of Francisella species, and (ii) the prediction of their virulence level, i.e., gain of a taxonomical level with the identification of Francisella tularensis subspecies. The detection of these biomarkers by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry is straightforward because of their abundance and the absence of other abundant protein species closely related in terms of m/z. The predicted molecular weights for the three biomarkers and their presence as intense peaks were confirmed with MALDI-TOF/MS spectra acquired on Francisella philomiragia ATCC 25015 and on Francisella tularensis subsp. tularensis CCUG 2112, the most virulent Francisella subspecies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据