4.5 Article

Therapeutic time window duration decreases with increasing severity of cerebral hypoxia-ischaemia under normothermia and delayed hypothermia in newborn piglets

期刊

BRAIN RESEARCH
卷 1154, 期 -, 页码 173-180

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.03.083

关键词

neuroprotection; hypothermia; hypoxia-ischaemia; therapeutic time window; neuronal death; latent-phase; secondary energy failure

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: For optimal neuroprotection following transient perinatal hypoxia-ischaemia (HI), therapy should start before overt secondary energy failure and its irreversible neurotoxic cascade. Hypothermia is a promising neuroprotective intervention that also prolongs the therapeutic time window (latent-phase; the period between reestablishment of apparently normal cerebral metabolism after HI, and the start of secondary energy failure). The influences of HI severity on latent-phase duration and regional neuroprotection are unclear. Under normothermia and delayed whole-body cooling to 35 and 33 therefore degrees C we aimed to assess relationships between HI severity and: (i) latent-phase duration; (ii) secondary -energy- failure severity; and (iii) neuronal injury 48 h following HI. Methods: Newborn piglets were randomized to: (i) Hi-normothermia (n = 12), (ii) HI-35 degrees C (n = 7), and (iii) HI-33 degrees C (n = 10). HI-35 degrees C and HI-33 degrees C piglets were cooled between 2 and 26 h after HI. Insult and secondary- energy- failure severity and latent-phase duration were evaluated using phosphorus magnetic resonance spectroscopy and compared with neuronal death in cortical-grey and deep-grey matter. Results: More severe HI was associated with shorter latent-phase (p=0.002), worse secondary energy failure (p=0.023) and more cortical-grey-matter neuronal death (p=0.016). Conclusions: Latent-phase duration is inversely related to insult severity; latent-phase brevity may explain the apparently less effective neuroprotection following severe cerebral HI. (C) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据