4.8 Article

How far will we need to go to reach HIV-infected people in rural South Africa?

期刊

BMC MEDICINE
卷 5, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/1741-7015-5-16

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [R01 AI041935] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The South African Government has outlined detailed plans for antiretroviral (ART) rollout in KwaZulu-Natal Province, but has not created a plan to address treatment accessibility in rural areas in KwaZulu-Natal. Here, we calculate the distance that People Living With HIV/AIDS (PLWHA) in rural areas in KwaZulu-Natal would have to travel to receive ART. Specifically, we address the health policy question 'How far will we need to go to reach PLWHA in rural KwaZulu-Natal?'. Methods: We developed a model to quantify treatment accessibility in rural areas; the model incorporates heterogeneity in spatial location of HCFs and patient population. We defined treatment accessibility in terms of the number of PLWHA that have access to an HCF. We modeled the treatment-accessibility region (i.e. catchment area) around an HCF by using a two-dimensional function, and assumed that treatment accessibility decreases as distance from an HCF increases. Specifically, we used a distance-discounting measure of ART accessibility based upon a modified form of a two-dimensional gravity-type model. We calculated the effect on treatment accessibility of: ( 1) distance from an HCF, and ( 2) the number of HCFs. Results: In rural areas in KwaZulu-Natal even substantially increasing the size of a small catchment area (e.g. from 1 km to 20 km) around an HCF would have a negligible impact (similar to 2%) on increasing treatment accessibility. The percentage of PLWHA who can receive ART in rural areas in this province could be as low as similar to 16%. Even if individuals were willing (and able) to travel 50 km to receive ART, only similar to 50% of those in need would be able to access treatment. Surprisingly, we show that increasing the number of available HCFs for ART distribution similar to threefold does not lead to a threefold increase in treatment accessibility in rural KwaZulu-Natal. Conclusion: Our results show that many PLWHA in rural KwaZulu-Natal are unlikely to have access to ART, and that the impact of an additional 37 HCFs on treatment accessibility in rural areas would be less substantial than might be expected. There is a great length to go before we will be able to reach many PLWHA in rural areas in South Africa, and specifically in KwaZulu-Natal.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据