4.8 Article

N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide testing improves the management of patients with suspected acute heart failure

期刊

CIRCULATION
卷 115, 期 24, 页码 3103-3110

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.666255

关键词

costs and cost analysis; healthcare economics and organizations; heart failure; natriuretic peptides

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background - The diagnostic utility of N- terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide ( NT- proBNP) in heart failure has been documented. However, most of the data were derived from countries with high healthcare resource use, and randomized evidence for utility of NT- proBNP was lacking. Methods and Results - We tested the hypothesis that NT- proBNP testing improves the management of patients presenting with dyspnea to emergency departments in Canada by prospectively comparing the clinical and economic impact of a randomized management strategy either guided by NT- proBNP results or without knowledge of NT- proBNP concentrations. Five hundred patients presenting with dyspnea to 7 emergency departments were studied. The median NT- proBNP level among the 230 subjects with a final diagnosis of heart failure was 3697 compared with 212 pg/mL in those without heart failure ( P < 0.00001). Knowledge of NT- proBNP results reduced the duration of ED visit by 21% ( 6.3 to 5.6 hours; P = 0.031), the number of patients rehospitalized over 60 days by 35% ( 51 to 33; P = 0.046), and direct medical costs of all ED visits, hospitalizations, and subsequent outpatient services ( US $ 6129 to US $ 5180 per patient; P = 0.023) over 60 days from enrollment. Adding NT- proBNP to clinical judgment enhanced the accuracy of a diagnosis; the area under the receiver- operating characteristic curve increased from 0.83 to 0.90 ( P < 0.00001). Conclusions - In a universal health coverage system mandating judicious use of healthcare resources, inclusion of NT- proBNP testing improves the management of patients presenting to emergency departments with dyspnea through improved diagnosis, cost savings, and improvement in selected outcomes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据