4.7 Article

A meta-analysis of the effect of exercise training on left ventricular remodeling in heart failure patients - The benefit depends on the type of training performed

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY
卷 49, 期 24, 页码 2329-2336

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.02.055

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives The aim of this study was to determine the effect of exercise training and type of exercise (aerobic vs. strength vs. combined training) on left ventricular (LV) remodeling in heart failure (HF). Background A number of randomized controlled trials have examined the effect of exercise training on LV remodeling in individuals with HF. However, the results of these trials have been inconclusive. Methods The authors searched MEDLINE (1966 to 2006), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (issue #3, 2006), CINAHL (1982 to 2006), EMBASE (1988 to 2006), PubMed (1966 to 2006), and reference lists of identified studies for randomized controlled trials examining the effects of exercise training on ejection fraction (EF), end-diastolic volume (EDV), and end-systolic volume (ESV) in clinically stable patients with HE Primary study authors were also contacted if appropriate. Studies were selected and data were extracted independently by 2 reviewers. Weighted mean differences (WMD) were calculated using a random effects model. Results Fourteen trials reported EF data (n = 812 patients). Seven trials reported both EDV and ESV data (n = 569). Aerobic training significantly improved EF (9 trials, 538 patients, WMD = 2.59%; 95% confidence interval [Cl] 1.44% to 3.74%), EDV (371 patients; WMD = -11.49 ml; 95% Cl -19.95 to -3.02 ml) and ESV (371 patients; WMD = -12.87 ml; 95% Cl -17.80 to -7.93 ml). Combined aerobic and strength training was not associated with significant improvements in EF, EDV, or ESV. Conclusions Aerobic training reverses LV remodeling in clinically stable individuals with HE This benefit was not confirmed with combined aerobic and strength training.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据