4.8 Article

Reproducible Automated Phosphopeptide Enrichment Using Magnetic TiO2 and Ti-IMAC

期刊

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 86, 期 20, 页码 10296-10302

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ac5025842

关键词

-

资金

  1. Sir Henry Wellcome Postdoctoral Fellowship [098847/Z/12/Z]
  2. Cancer Research UK Career Establishment Award [C37293/A12905]
  3. BBSRC [BB/J017450/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. MRC [MC_UU_12016/5, G1100713, MC_UP_A500_1020] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Wellcome Trust [098847/Z/12/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust
  6. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/J017450/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. Cancer Research UK [12905] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. Medical Research Council [G1100713, MC_UP_A500_1020, MC_UU_12016/5] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Reproducible, comprehensive phosphopeptide enrichment is essential for studying phosphorylation-regulated processes. Here, we describe the application of hyper-porous magnetic TiO2 and Ti-IMAC microspheres for uniform automated phosphopeptide enrichment. Combining magnetic microspheres with a magnetic particle-handling robot enables rapid (45 min), reproducible (r(2) = 0.80) and high-fidelity (>90% purity) phosphopeptide purification in a 96-well format. Automated phosphopeptide enrichment demonstrates reproducible synthetic phosphopeptide recovery across 2 orders of magnitude, well-to-well quantitative reproducibility indistinguishable to internal SILAC standards, and robust plate-to-plate reproducibility across 5 days of independent enrichments. As a result, automated phosphopeptide enrichment enables statistical analysis of label-free phosphoproteomic samples in a high-throughput manner. This technique uses commercially available, off-the-shelf components and can be easily adopted by any laboratory interested in phosphoproteomic analysis. We provide a free downloadable automated phosphopeptide enrichment program to facilitate uniform interlaboratory collaboration and exchange of phosphoproteomic data sets.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据