4.7 Article

Radon in Chalk streams: Spatial and temporal variation of groundwater sources in the Pang and Lambourn catchments, UK

期刊

JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY
卷 339, 期 3-4, 页码 172-182

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.03.010

关键词

radon; chalk rivers; river-aquifer; interactions; groundwater hydrology

资金

  1. Natural Environment Research Council [NER/T/S/2001/00948] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Variations in dissolved Rn-222 (radon) concentrations in rivers and groundwater are observed in the Cretaceous Chalk catchments of the Pang and Lambourn. Stream radon concentrations and flow data were used to model radon inputs to rivers from groundwater, with the modelled radon input concentrations (C-I) varying between 0.2 Bq l(-1) and 3.8 Bq l(-1), consistent with measured groundwater values. Groundwater in both catchments was found to have higher and more variable radon concentrations (2-12 Bq l(-1)) in the near surface, weathered horizons, compared to a consistent 1 Bq l(-1) from the solid Chalk. The variations in C-I can be related to flow generation pathways and hydrological events. In the Lambourn, the radon budget is controlled by diffuse groundwater inputs, supporting the hypothesis that the alluvial aquifer plays a greater role during periods of high accretion. The Pang is more complex than the Lambourn having a combination of diffuse and point source inputs, with spring inputs dominating both flow and radon signatures in the lower part of the catchment. Significant temporal and spatial variations were determined for C-I in both catchments reflecting their differing geologies and flow regimes. One use of radon in hydrology is the determination of groundwater discharges to rivers, but the observed variations in C-I mean this approach may not be appropriate to all situations and that changes in source need further evaluation. Nonetheless, radon is shown to be a useful tracer of flow paths and processes within these catchments. (c) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据