4.8 Article

Ultra Pressure Liquid Chromatography-Negative Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry Determination of Twelve Halobenzoquinones at ng/L Levels in Drinking Water

期刊

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 85, 期 9, 页码 4520-4529

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ac400160r

关键词

-

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  2. Alberta Innovates-Energy and Environment Solutions
  3. Alberta Health
  4. University of Alberta FS Chia Doctoral Scholarship
  5. Provost Doctoral Entrance Award
  6. Alberta Innovates-Technology Futures Graduate Scholarship
  7. Vanier Canada Scholarship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We report here the characterization of twelve halobenzoquinones (HBQs) using electrospray ionization (ESI) high resolution quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry. The high resolution negative ESI spectra of the twelve HBQs formed two parent ions, [M + H+ + 2e(-)], and the radical M-center dot. The intensities of these two parent ions are dependent on their chemical structures and on instrumental parameters such as the source temperature and flow rate. The characteristic ions of the HBQs were used to develop an ultra pressure liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) method. At the UPLC flow rate (400 mu L/min) and under the optimized ESI conditions, eleven HBQs showed the stable and abundant transitions [M + H+ + 2e(-)] -> X- (X- representing Cl-, Br-, or I-), while dibromo-dimethyl-benzoquinone (DBDMBQ) showed only the transition of M-center dot -> Br-. The UPLC efficiently separates all HBQs including some HBQisomers, while the MS/MS offers exquisite limits of detection (LODs) at subng/rnL levels for all HBQs except DBDMBQ, Combined with solid phase extraction (SPE), the method LOD is down to ng/L. The results from analysis of authentic samples demonstrated that the SPE-UPLC-MS/MS method is reliable, fast, and sensitive for the identification and quantification of the twelve HBQs in drinking water.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据