4.6 Article

PtSn/SiO2 catalysts prepared by controlled surface reactions for citral hydrogenation in liquid phase

期刊

APPLIED CATALYSIS A-GENERAL
卷 326, 期 1, 页码 37-47

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcata.2007.03.027

关键词

PtSn/SiO2 catalysts; selective hydrogenation; citral hydrogenation; controlled surface reactions

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bimetallic PtSn/SiO2 catalysts with broad Sn/Pt atomic ratios were prepared by an organometallic method using a controlled surface reactions (CSRs) between hydrogen adsorbed on silica-supported Pt and tin tetraethyl. The catalytic behavior of these catalysts was studied in citral hydrogenation in liquid phase carried out at 70 degrees C and atmospheric pressure. The catalysts were characterized by test reactions of the metallic phase (cyclohexane dehydrogenation (CHID), and cyclopentane hydrogenolysis (CPH)), CO chemisorption and Mossbauer spectroscopy. All these results clearly showed that tin was introduced exclusively into platinum. Results of citral hydrogenation show that the contribution of different reaction routes strongly depends on the metallic loading of both Pt and Sri, thus giving either a high selectivity to citronellal (CAL) or to unsaturated alcohols nerol + geraniol (UA). for monometallic and bimetallic catalysts, respectively. The citronellal cyclization resulting in the formation of isopulegol. was almost negligible because of the low concentration of acidic sites of the support. It was observed that the higher the Pt loading, the lower the Sn/Pt atomic ratio required to get higher UA selectivities. Products of undesirable side reactions were detected in trace amount. The results of CO chemisorption and CHD test reaction provided unambiguous prove that, due to the addition of tin, the catalytic properties of the metallic phase have been modified. Thus, results show that modified catalysts are highly selective for the hydrogenation of the carbonyl group. (c) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据