4.7 Article

Histamine and spontaneously released mast cell granules affect the cell growth of human hepatocellular carcinoma cells

期刊

EXPERIMENTAL AND MOLECULAR MEDICINE
卷 39, 期 3, 页码 284-294

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/emm.2007.32

关键词

beta-catenin; BIRC5 protein; human; carcinoma, hepatocellular; cyclooxygenase 2; histamine; mast cells

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The role of mast cells in tumor growth is still controversial. In this study we analyzed the effects of both histamine and pre-formed mediators spontaneously released by mast cells on the growth of two human hepatocellular carcinoma cell lines, HA22T/VGH and HuH-6, with different characteristics of differentiation, biological behavior and genetic defects. We showed that total mast cell releasate, exocytosed granules (granule remnants) and histamine reduced cell viability and proliferation in HuH-6 cells. In contrast, in HA22T/VGH cells granule remnants and histamine induced a weak but significant increase in cell growth. We showed that both cell lines expressed histamine receptors H-1 and H-2 and that the selective H-1 antagonist terfenadine reverted the histamine-induced inhibition of HuH-6 cell growth, whereas the selective H2 antagonist ranitidine inhibited the histamine-induced cell growth of HA22T/VGH cells. We demonstrated that histamine down-regulated the expression of beta-catenin, COX-2 and survivin in HuH-6 cells and that this was associated with caspase-3 activation and PARP cleavage. On the contrary, in HA22T/VGH cells expression of survivin and beta-catenin increased after treatment with granule remnants and histamine. Overall, our results suggest that mediators stored in mast cell granules and histamine may affect the growth of liver cancer cells. However, mast cells and histamine may play different roles depending on the tumor cell features. Finally, these data suggest that histamine and histamine receptor agonists/ antagonists might be considered as new therapeutic drugs to inhibit liver tumor growth.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据