4.7 Article

Late paleozoic tectonic history of the ertix fault in the chinese altai and its implications for the development of the central Asian orogenic system

期刊

GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA BULLETIN
卷 119, 期 7-8, 页码 944-960

出版社

GEOLOGICAL SOC AMER, INC
DOI: 10.1130/B26044.1

关键词

Ertix; Irtysh; central Asia; magmatism; Xinjiang; deformation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Central Asian Orogenic System (CAOS) is one of the largest Phanerozoic accretionary orogens in the world and may represent a significant site of continental growth. Its origin has been explained by two competing models: syn-subduction strikeslip duplication of a single (> 1000 km) long-lived arc (ca. 630-360 Ma) or collision of multiple arcs and micro-continents. Central to the debate are the relative roles of syn-subduction strike-slip faulting versus thrusting. In both models, the Ertix fault figures prominently, either as a roof fault of a large strike-slip duplex system developed during oceanic subduction or as a suture of arc-continent or continent-continent collision. In order to differentiate between the above models, we conducted field mapping, detailed kinematic analysis, and geochrono-logical dating of the Ertix fault zone in the Chinese Altai. Our work indicates that the fault is a crustal-scale thrust that was active in the Permian. Its hanging wall records two pulses of magmatism ca. 450 Ma and ca. 280 Ma and experienced peak pressure and temperature of 6.2-7.7 kbar and 560670 degrees C. Our geologic observations, together with the existing geologic information, favor a tectonic model that involves two episodes of subduction below the Altai arc: first, in the Ordovician, along a south-dipping subduction zone; and second, in the late Carboniferous and early Permian along northdipping subduction of the Junggar ocean. It was during the latter event that a melange complex was underplated below the older Ordovician arc, metamorphosed at lower crustal depths, and then exhumed to the upper crust along the south-directed Ertix thrust zone.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据