4.7 Article

Cocrystals of piroxicam with carboxylic acids

期刊

CRYSTAL GROWTH & DESIGN
卷 7, 期 7, 页码 1291-1304

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/cg060742p

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A crystal engineering method was used to investigate cocrystal formation of piroxicam with pharmaceutically acceptable carboxylic acids. Forming cocrystals of piroxicam can potentially result in solid forms with increased bioavailability. A total of 50 unique cocrystals containing piroxicam and a guest carboxylic acid were identified in screening experiments. Each of the 23 guest molecules tested formed at least one cocrystal with piroxicam. In addition, the three known polymorphs of piroxicam were observed. Raman data for the piroxicam cocrystals can be sorted into three distinct groups based on spectral similarity. These groups are differentiated by the piroxicam tautomer present in the cocrystal and the presence or absence of a strong hydrogen bond donor interacting with piroxicam's amide carbonyl group. X-ray powder diffraction data revealed six isostructural piroxicam cocrystals. Single-crystal structure determination revealed that this isostructural series is a host-guest system in which the piroxicam forms a well-ordered host containing disordered guest compounds. Crystal structures of eight piroxicam cocrystals and a dioxane solvate of piroxicam are reported. All carboxylic acid guest compounds are non-ionized in the cocrystals, and piroxicam is present as the non-ionized or zwitterionic tautomer. Of special interest are two 1:1 piroxicam/4-hydroxybenzoic acid cocrystal polymorphs. While the unit cell contents are identical, one polymorph contains the non-ionized piroxicam tautomer plus the guest, while the other contains the zwitterionic tautomer plus the guest. In a related phenomenon, a 4:1 piroxicam/fumaric acid cocrystal is reported that contains one zwitterionic tautomer, one non-ionized tautomer, and one-half of a non-ionized fumaric acid in the asymmetric unit.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据