4.8 Article

High-Throughput Secretomic Analysis of Single Cells to Assess Functional Cellular Heterogeneity

期刊

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 85, 期 4, 页码 2548-2556

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ac400082e

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH LINCS Program Technology Center (NIH) [1 U01 CA164252]
  2. U.S. National Cancer Institute Howard Temin Pathway to Independence Award (NIH) [4R00 CA136759]
  3. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation through the Grand Challenges Explorations Initiative
  4. Alzheimer Association New Investigator Grant
  5. NIH [U54CA143868, R01 GM084204, U54 CA143798]
  6. Single Cell Profiling Core

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Secreted proteins dictate a range of cellular functions in human health and disease. Because of the high degree of cellular heterogeneity and, more importantly, polyfunctionality of individual cells, there is an unmet need to simultaneously measure an array of proteins from single cells and to rapidly assay a large number of single cells (more than 1000) in parallel. We describe a simple bioanalytical assay platform consisting of a large array of subnanoliter microchambers integrated with high-density antibody barcode microarrays for highly multiplexed protein detection from over a thousand single cells in parallel. This platform has been tested for both cell lines and complex biological samples such as primary cells from patients. We observed distinct heterogeneity among the single cell secretomic signatures that, for the first time, can be directly correlated to the cells' physical behavior such as migration. Compared to the state-of-the-art protein secretion assay such as ELISpot and emerging microtechnology-enabled assays, our approach offers both high throughput and high multiplicity. It also has a number of clinician-friendly features such as ease of operation, low sample consumption, and standardized data analysis, representing a potentially transformative tool for informative monitoring of cellular function and immunity in patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据