4.8 Article

Development of an Online Microbore Hollow Fiber Enzyme Reactor Coupled with Nanoflow Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry for Global Proteomics

期刊

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 85, 期 11, 页码 5506-5513

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ac400625k

关键词

-

资金

  1. Converging Research Center Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)
  2. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology [2011K000890]
  3. KRISS
  4. [NRF-2010-0014046]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, we report the development of a microbore hollow fiber enzyme reactor (mHFER) coupled to nanoflow liquid chromatography-tandem mass, spectrometry (nLC-ESI-MS/MS) for the online digestion or selective enrichment of glycopeptides and analysis of proteins. With mHFER, enzymatic digestion of protein could be achieved by continuous flow within a very small volume (-10 mu L) of mHF inserted in a PEEK tube. Digested peptides exited through the pores of the hollow, fiber membrane wall to external single or multiplexed trap columns for nLC-ESI-MS/MS analysis. Evaluation of online mHFER, -nLC-ESI-Mg/MS system was made with bovine, serum albumin,(B varying SA) by varying the temperature of digestion and the amount of protein injected. We evaluated the ability of the mHFER system to enrich glycopeptides by injecting a and digested peptides from alpha-1-acid glycoprotein (AGP) into the mHFER, followed by, delivery of PNGase F for endoglycosidic digestion Nonglycosylated peptides unbound to lectins eluted at the first breakthrough run while N-linked glycopeptides eluted after the endoglycosidic digestion. the developed method was applied to urine samples from patients with prosatate cancer and controls, endoglycosidic digestion. The developed method was applied to urine samples from Patients with Prostate cancer and controls; 67 N-linked glycopeptides were identified and relative differences in glycopeptide content between patient and control samples were determined.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据