4.8 Article

Screen Printed Flexible Radiofrequency Identification Tag for Oxygen Monitoring

期刊

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 85, 期 22, 页码 11098-11105

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ac4028802

关键词

-

资金

  1. Junta de Andalucia [P10-TIC-5997, P10-FQM-5974]
  2. European Regional Development Funds (ERDF)
  3. MICINN [PYR-2012-12, CEB09-0010, CEI2013-P-2]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this work, a radiofrequency identification (RFID) tag with an optical indicator for the measurement of gaseous oxygen is described. It consists of an O-2 sensing membrane of PtOEP together with a full electronic system for RFID communication, all printed on a flexible substrate. The membrane is excited by an LED at 385 nm wavelength and the intensity of the luminescence generated is registered by means of a digital color detector. The output data corresponding to the red coordinate of the RGB color space is directly related to the concentration of O-2, and it is sent to a microcontroller. The RFID tag is designed and implemented by screen printing on a flexible substrate for the wireless transmission of the measurement to a remote reader. It can operate in both active and passive mode, obtaining the power supply from the electromagnetic waves of the RFID reader or from a small battery, respectively. This system has been fully characterized and calibrated including temperature drifts, showing a high-resolution performance that allows measurement of very low values of oxygen content. Therefore this system is perfectly suitable for its use in modified atmosphere packaging where the oxygen concentration is reduced below 2%. As the reading of the O-2 concentration inside the envelope is carried out with an external RFID reader using wireless communication, there is no need for perforations for probes or wires, so the packaging remains completely closed. With the presented device, a limit of detection of 40 ppm and a resolution as low as 0.1 ppm of O-2 can be reached with a low power consumption of 3.55 mA.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据