4.7 Article

CD20-specific antibody-targeted chemotherapy of non-Hodgkin's B-cell lymphoma using calicheamicin-conjugated rituximab

期刊

CANCER IMMUNOLOGY IMMUNOTHERAPY
卷 56, 期 7, 页码 1107-1117

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00262-006-0260-5

关键词

calicheamicin; rituximab; CD20; immunoconjugates; anti-tumor

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tumor-targeted delivery of a potent cytotoxic agent, calicheamicin, using its immunoconjugates is a clinically validated therapeutic strategy. Rituximab is a human CD20-specific chimeric antibody extensively used in B-NHL therapy. We investigated whether conjugation to calicheamicin can improve the anti-tumor activity of rituximab against human B-cell lymphoma (BCL) xenografts in preclinical models. BCL cells were cultured with rituximab or its calicheamicin conjugates and their in vitro growth was monitored. BCL cells were injected s.c. to establish localized xenografts in nude mice or i.v. to establish disseminated BCL in severe combined immunodeficient (scid) mice. I.p. treatment with rituximab or its calicheamicin conjugates was initiated and its effect on s.c. BCL growth or survival of mice with disseminated BCL was monitored. Conjugation of calicheamicin to rituximab vastly enhanced its growth inhibitory activity against BCL in vitro. Conjugation to calicheamicin had no deleterious effect on the effector functional activity of rituximab. Calicheamicin conjugated to rituximab with an acid-labile linker exhibited greater anti-tumor activity against s.c. BCL xenografts and improved survival of mice with disseminated BCL over that of unconjugated rituximab. Anti-tumor activities of rituximab conjugated to calicheamicin via an acid-stable linker were similar to that of unconjugated rituximab. Superior anti-tumor efficacy exhibited by a calicheamicin immunoconjugate of rituximab with an acid-labile linker over that of rituximab demonstrates the therapeutic potential of CD20-specific antibody-targeted chemotherapy strategy in the treatment of B-NHL.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据