4.7 Article

Predictors of medication adherence in inflammatory bowel disease

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY
卷 102, 期 7, 页码 1417-1426

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01212.x

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND This study reports cross-sectional medication adherence data from year 1 of the Manitoba AND AIMS: Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) Cohort Study, a longitudinal, population-based study of multiple determinants of health outcomes in IBD in those diagnosed within 7 yr. METHODS: A total of 326 participants completed a validated multi-item self-report measure of adherence, which assesses a range of adherence behaviors. Demographic, clinical, and psycho-social characteristics were also assessed by survey. Adherence was initially considered as a continuous variable and then categorized as high or low adherence for logistic regression analysis to determine predictors of adherence behavior. RESULTS: Using the cutoff score of 20/ 25 on the Medication Adherence Report Scale, high adherence was reported by 73% of men and 63% of women. For men, predictors of low adherence included diagnosis (UC: OR 4.42, 95% CI 1.66 - 11.75) and employment status (employed: OR 11.27, 95% CI 2.05 - 62.08). For women, predictors of low adherence included younger age ( under 30 versus over 50 OR 3.64, 95% CI 1.41 - 9.43; under 30 vs. 40 - 49 yr: OR 2.62, 95% CI 1.07 - 6.42). High scores on the Obstacles to Medication Use Scale strongly related to low adherence for both men ( OR 4.05, 95% CI 1.40 - 11.70) and women ( OR 3.89, 95% CI 1.90 - 7.99). 5- ASA use (oral or rectal) was not related to adherence. For women, immunosuppressant use versus no use was associated with high adherence (OR 4.49, 95% CI 1.58 - 12.76). Low trait agreeableness was associated with low adherence ( OR 2.03, 95% CI 1.12 - 3.66). CONCLUSIONS: Approximately one-third of IBD patients were low adherers. Predictors of adherence differed markedly between genders, although obstacles such as medication cost were relevant for both men and women.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据