4.6 Article

Loss of neprilysin function promotes amyloid plaque formation and causes cerebral amyloid angiopathy

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY
卷 171, 期 1, 页码 241-251

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.2353/ajpath.2007.070105

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIA NIH HHS [AG12749, K23 AG022476, AG022476, R01 AG012749, R37 AG013956, R01 AG013956, AG13956] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDA NIH HHS [T32 DA007261, DA07261] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NINDS NIH HHS [NS046324, K08 NS046324] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cerebral deposition of the amyloid 6 protein (A beta), an invariant feature of Alzheimer's disease, reflects an imbalance between the rates of A beta production and clearance. The causes of A beta elevation in the common late-onset form of Alzheimer's disease (LOAD) are largely unknown. There is evidence that the A beta-degrading protease neprilysin (NEP) is down-regulated in normal aging and LOAD. We asked whether a decrease in endogenous NEP levels can prolong the half-life of A,6 in vivo and promote development of the classic amyloid neuropathology of Alzheimer's disease. We examined the brains and plasma of young and old mice expressing relatively low levels of human amyloid precursor protein and having one or both NEP genes silenced. NEP loss of function 1) elevated whole-brain and plasma levels of human AB(40) and A beta 42, 2) prolonged the half-life of soluble A beta in brain interstitial fluid of awake animals, 3) raised the concentration of A beta dimers, 4) markedly increased hippocampal amyloid plaque burden, and 5) led to the development of amyloid angiopathy. A similar to 50% reduction in NEP levels, similar to that reported in some LOAD brains, was sufficient to increase amyloid neuropathology. These findings demonstrate an important role for proteolysis in determining the levels of A,6 and A beta-associated neuropathology in vivo and support the hypothesis that primary defects in A beta clearance can cause or contribute to LOAD pathogenesis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据