4.1 Article

Topiramate (topamax) reduces conditioned abstinence behaviours and handling-induced convulsions (HIC) after chronic administration of alcohol in Swiss-Webster mice

期刊

ALCOHOL AND ALCOHOLISM
卷 42, 期 4, 页码 296-300

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/alcalc/agm047

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Topiramate has emerged as one of the promising drugs for the treatment of alcoholism and alcohol addiction. Recent studies have shown that topiramate reduces harmful drinking. and initiates abstinence in humans, but little is known as to why this drug is effective. Aims: In the present study, we examined the effects of topiramate in reducing convulsions during alcohol withdrawal using a procedure called the handling-induced convulsion (HIC) test in male Swiss-Webster mice. In addition, we examined the ability of topiramate to reduce alcohol conditioned and anxiety related behaviours during conditioned abstinence using the elevated plus maze (EPM) test. Methods: HICs were examined 10 h after the 3rd daily alcohol (2.5 g/kg; 20% w/v) + 4 methylpyrazole (4MP) (9 mg/kg) intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection with topiramate (0, 10 or 20 mg/kg ip) administered 30 min before testing. In the EPM, alcohol (1.75 g/kg; 20%. i.p.) or saline was administered daily for 9 days and subjects were immediately placed on the maze. Anxiety related behaviours included the amount of time spent and number of entries in the open or closed arms and grooming bouts, and conditioned behaviours including the stretched-attend posture were examined 24 It after the last day of alcohol injection. Results: Topiramate (10 and 20 mg/kg) significantly reduced HIC scores (P < 0.05) compared to the alcohol/saline group. In the EPM. topiramate (20 mg/kg) reduced the stretched-attend postures (P < 0.001) compared to the alcohol/saline group. Conclusion: These findings suggest that topiramate reduces HICs during alcohol withdrawal and alcohol-conditioned behaviours during conditioned abstinence in Swiss-Webster mice.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据