4.8 Article

Highly Selective and Sensitive Detection of Mercuric Ion Based on a Visual Fluorescence Method

期刊

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 84, 期 22, 页码 9792-9801

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ac302822c

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2011CB933700]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of China [21077108, 21173229]
  3. Innovation Project of Chinese Academy of Sciences [KJCX2-YW-H29]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The instant and on-site detection of trace aqueous mercuric ion still remains a challenge for environmental monitoring and protection. This work demonstrates a new analytical method and its utility for visual detection of aqueous He on the basis of a novel water-soluble CdSe-ZnS quantum dots (QDs) functionalized with a bidentate ligand of 2-hydroxyethyldithiocarbamate (HDTC). The fluorescence of the aqueous HDTC modified QDs (HDTC-QDs) could be selectively and efficiently quenched by Hg2+ through a surface chelating reaction between HDTC and Hg2+, and the detection limit was measured to be 1 ppb. Most interestingly, the orange fluorescence of the HDTC-QDs gradually changes to red upon the increasing amount of Hg2+ added besides the decreasing of the fluorescence intensity. By taking advantage of this optical phenomenon, a paper-based sensor for aqueous Hg2+ detection has been developed by immobilizing the HDTC-QDs on cellulose acetate paper which has low background fluorescence in the wavelength range. The paper-based sensor showed high sensitivity and selectivity for Hg2+ visual detection. When Hg2+ was dropped onto the paper-sensor, an obviously distinguishable fluorescence color evolution (from orange to red) could be clearly observed depending on the concentration of Hg2+. The limit of detection of the visual method for aqueous Hg2+ detection was as low as 0.2 ppm. The very simple and effective strategy reported here should facilitate the development of portable and reliable fluorescence chemosensors for mercuric pollution control.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据