4.8 Article

Clinically Relevant Microfluidic Magnetophoretic Isolation of Rare-Cell Populations for Diagnostic and Therapeutic Monitoring Applications

期刊

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 84, 期 3, 页码 1336-1344

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ac2022844

关键词

-

资金

  1. IGERT [NSF-DGE-0504331]
  2. National Science Foundation [CBET-0827868, 0932195]
  3. Northeastern University
  4. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys
  5. Directorate For Engineering [0932195] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cells of biomedical interest are, despite their functional significance, often present in very small numbers. Therefore the analysis and isolation of previously inaccessible rare cells, such as peripheral hematopoietic stem cells, endothelial progenitor cells, or circulating tumor cells, require efficient, sensitive, and specific procedures that do not compromise the viability of the cells. The current study builds on previous work on a rationally designed microfluidic magnetophoretic cell separation platform capable of throughputs of 240 mu L min(-1). Proof-of-concept was first conducted using MCF-7 (1-1000 total cells) as the target rare cell spiked into high concentrations of Raji B-lymphocyte nontarget cells (similar to 10(6) total cells). These experiments lead to the establishment of a magnet-based separation for the isolation of 50 MCF-7 cells directly from whole blood. Results show an efficiency of collection greater than 85%, with a purity of over 90%. Next, resident endothelial progenitor cells and hematopoietic stem cells are directly isolated from whole human blood in a rapid and efficient fashion (>96%). Both cell populations could be simultaneously isolated and, via immunofluorescent staining, individually identified and enumerated. Overall, the presented device illustrates a viable separation platform for high purity, efficient, and rapid collection of rare cell populations directly from whole blood samples.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据