4.6 Article

Sp1 and Sp3 mediate NHE2 gene transcription in the intestinal epithelial cells

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajpgi.00443.2006

关键词

Sp1; Sp3; NHE2 gene; intestine; epithelium

资金

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [5R01 DK 41274] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Our previous studies have identified a minimal Sp1-driven promoter region (nt -36/+116) directing NHE2 expression in mouse renal epithelial cells. However, this minimal promoter region was not sufficient to support active transcription of NHE2 gene in the intestinal epithelial cells, suggesting the need for additional upstream regulatory elements. In the present study, we used nontransformed rat intestinal epithelial (RIE) cells as a model to identify the minimal promoter region and transcription factors necessary for the basal transcription of rat NHE2 gene in the intestinal epithelial cells. We identified a region within the rat NHE2 gene promoter located within nt -67/-43 upstream of transcription initiation site as indispensable for the promoter function in intestinal epithelial cells. Mutations at nt -56/-51 not only abolished the DNA-protein interaction in this region, but also completely abolished NHE2 gene promoter activity in RIE cells. Supershift assays revealed that Sp1 and Sp3 interact with this promoter region, but, contrary to the minimal promoter indispensable for renal expression of NHE2, both transcription factors expressed individually in Drosophila SL2 cells activated rat NHE2 gene promoter. Moreover, Sp1 was a weaker transactivator and when coexpressed in SL2 cells it reduced Sp3-mediated NHE2 basal promoter activity. Furthermore, DNase I footprinting confirmed that nt -58/-51 is protected by nuclear protein from RIE cells. We conclude that the mechanism of basal control of rat NHE2 gene promoter activity is different in the renal and intestinal epithelium, with Sp3 being the major transcriptional activator of NHE2 gene transcription in the intestinal epithelial cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据