4.8 Article

Synthesis and Characterization of Bromophenol Glucuronide and Sulfate Conjugates for Their Direct LC-MS/MS Quantification in Human Urine as Potential Exposure Markers for Polybrominated Diphenyl Ethers

期刊

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 84, 期 22, 页码 9881-9888

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ac302161t

关键词

-

资金

  1. GRF from the Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China [CityU 160510]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bromophenol glucuronide and sulfate conjugates have been reported to be products of mammalian metabolism of polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs), a group of additive flame-retardants found ubiquitously in the environment. In order to explore their occurrence in human urine, four water-soluble bromophenol conjugates, namely, 2,4-dibromophenyl glucuronide, 2,4,6-tribromophenyl glucuronide, 2,4-dibromophenyl sulfate, and 2,4,6-tribromophenyl sulfate, were synthesized, purified, and characterized. An analytical protocol using solid-phase extraction and ion-paired liquid chromatography electrospray tandem mass spectrometry (LC-ESI-MS/MS) quantification has been developed for the direct and simultaneous determination of these glucuronide and sulfate conjugates in human urine samples. The limit of detections for all analytes were below 13 pg mL(-1), with 73-101% analyte recovery and 7.2-8.6% repeatability. The method was applied to analyze 20 human urine samples collected randomly from voluntary donors in Hong Kong SAP, China. All the samples were found to contain one or more of the bromophenol conjugates, with concentration ranging from 0.13-2.45 mu g g(-1) creatinine. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first analytical protocol for the direct and simultaneous monitoring of these potential phase II metabolites of PBDEs in human urine. Our results have also suggested the potential of these bromophenol conjugates in human urine to be convenient molecular markers for the quantification of population exposure to PBDEs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据