4.8 Article

Enhancement in the Sensitivity of Microfluidic Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assays through Analyte Preconcentration

期刊

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 84, 期 16, 页码 7029-7036

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ac3011632

关键词

-

资金

  1. University of Wyoming
  2. National Science Foundation [DBI 0964211]
  3. Wyoming INBRE [P20RR016474]
  4. Direct For Biological Sciences
  5. Div Of Biological Infrastructure [0964211] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this Article, we describe a microfluidic enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) method whose sensitivity can be substantially enhanced through preconcentration of the target analyte around a semipermeable membrane. The reported preconcentration has been accomplished in our current work via electrokinetic means allowing a significant increase in the amount of captured analyte relative to nonspecific binding in the trapping/detection zone. Upon introduction of an enzyme substrate into this region, the rate of generation of the ELISA reaction product (resorufin) was observed to increase by over a factor of 200 for the sample and 2 for the corresponding blank compared to similar assays without analyte trapping. Interestingly, in spite of nonuniformities in the amount of captured analyte along the surface of our analysis channel, the measured fluorescence signal in the preconcentration zone increased linearly with time over an enzyme reaction period of 30 min and at a rate that was proportional to the analyte concentration in the bulk sample. In our current study, the reported technique has been shown to reduce the smallest detectable concentration of the tumor marker CA 19-9 and Blue Tongue Viral antibody by over 2 orders of magnitude compared to immunoassays without analyte preconcentration. When compared to microwell based ELISAs, the reported microfluidic approach not only yielded a similar improvement in the smallest detectable analyte concentration but also reduced the sample consumption in the assay by a factor of 20 (5 mu L versus 100 mu L).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据