4.7 Article

Increased plasma concentrations of soluble CD40 ligand in acute coronary syndrome depend on in vitro platelet activation

期刊

CLINICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 53, 期 7, 页码 1231-1234

出版社

AMER ASSOC CLINICAL CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2007.085332

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Soluble CD40 ligand (sCD40L) was suggested as a novel biomarker of cardiovascular risk. We examined the effect of preanalytical variation on the measurement of sCD40L concentration. Methods: From healthy control individuals (n = 20) and patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) (n = 20) or sepsis (n = 20), we obtained blood drawn into 5 tubes containing citrate or a mixture of citrate, theophylline, adenosine, and dipyridamole (CTAD). The tubes were incubated for 30 min at room temperature or 0 degrees C before a single or double centrifugation (15 min, 2500g) at room temperature or 4 degrees C, respectively. sCD40L, beta-thromboglobulin (beta TG), and platelet factor 4 (PF4) concentrations were measured using immunoassays. Results: Concentrations of sCD40L were very low in all CTAD and citrated samples maintained at 0 degrees C (median <= 0.076 mu g/L). Although increased beta TG and PF4 confirmed disease-related in vivo platelet activation, sCD40L was not higher in patients than in controls. In contrast, if the samples were processed at room temperature, sCD40L was significantly higher in ACS patients than in controls (P <0.02 in CTAD and citrated plasma at room temperature). Moreover, the beta TG:PF4 ratio decreased in patient but not control CTAD samples, suggesting a greater susceptibility of patient platelets to in vitro activation. Conclusions: Increased sCD40L concentrations resulted from in vitro platelet activation during sample preparation. Disease-related in vivo activation did not contribute to sCD40L concentrations in plasma. Therefore, published studies of sCD40L demand cautious interpretation, because their preanalytical conditions were not standardized. (c) 2007 American Association for Clinical Chemistry.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据