4.8 Article

Composite QDs@MIP Nanospheres for Specific Recognition and Direct Fluorescent Quantification of Pesticides in Aqueous Media

期刊

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 84, 期 1, 页码 386-395

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ac202735v

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [20175009, 20871004]
  2. State Key Project of Fundamental Research of China [2011CB932403, 2011CBA00503]
  3. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University of China [NCET-10-0213]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Quantum dots (QDs)-based molecularly imprinted polymer (MIP) composite nanospheres were successfully prepared via a facile and versatile ultrasonication-assisted encapsulation method. Unlike the hydrogen-bond-based Mil's, these so-prepared QDs-MIP composite nanospheres, relying on the interaction including van der Waals forces and hydrophobic forces, demonstrated excellent selectivity in aqueous media. Their small particle sizes and carboxyl-enriched polymer matrixes give rise to their good dispersibility and stability in aqueous solution, and faster adsorption and desorption kinetics, which further make them extensively applicable for chemical/biological sensors in aqueous media. Based on the fluorescence quenching via template analytes (diazinon) rebinding into the recognition cavities in the polymer matrixes, the QDs-MIP nanospheres were successfully applied to the direct fluorescence quantification of diazinon, independent of extracting templates from the MIP nanospheres, as well as further complicated and time-consuming assays. This novel method can selectively and sensitively detect down to SO ng/mL of diazinon in water, and a linear relationship has been obtained covering the concentration range of 50-600 ng/mL. The present studies provide a new and general strategy to fabricate other multifunctional (luminescent and magnetic) inorganic organic MIP nanocomposites with highly selective recognition ability in aqueous media and are pretty desirable for biomedical/chemical sensing applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据