4.5 Article

Vitamin K2 supplementation improves hip bone geometry and bone strength indices in postmenopausal women

期刊

OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL
卷 18, 期 7, 页码 963-972

出版社

SPRINGER LONDON LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s00198-007-0337-9

关键词

bone mineral content; femoral neck strength; fracture risk; menaquinone; osteoporosis; vitamin K

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Vitamin K mediates the synthesis of proteins regulating bone metabolism. We have tested whether high vitamin K-2 intake promotes bone mineral density and bone strength. Results showed that K-2 improved BMC and femoral neck width, but not DXA-BMD. Hence high vitamin K-2 intake may contribute to preventing postmenopausal bone loss. Introduction Vitamin K is involved in the synthesis of several proteins in bone. The importance of K vitamins for optimal bone health has been suggested by population-based studies, but intervention studies with DXA-BMD as a clinical endpoint have shown contradicting results. Unlike BMC, DXA-BMD does not take into account the geometry (size, thickness) of bone, which has an independent contribution to bone strength and fracture risk. Here we have tested whether BMC and femoral neck width are affected by high vitamin K intake. Methods A randomized clinical intervention study among 325 postmenopausal women receiving either placebo or 45 mg/day of vitamin K-2 (MK-4, menatetrenone) during three years. BMC and hip geometry were assessed by DXA. Bone strength indices were calculated from DXA-BMD, femoral neck width (FNW) and hip axis length (HAL). Results K-2 did not affect the DXA-BMD, but BMC and the FNW had increased relative to placebo. In the K-2-treated group hip bone strength remained unchanged during the 3-year intervention period, whereas in the placebo group bone strength decreased significantly. Conclusions Vitamin K-2 helps maintaining bone strength at the site of the femoral neck in postmenopausal women by improving BMC and FNW, whereas it has little effect on DXA-BMD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据