4.8 Article

An LC-MS-Based Chemical and Analytical Method for Targeted Metabolite Quantification in the Model Cyanobacterium Synechococcus sp. PCC 7002

期刊

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 83, 期 10, 页码 3808-3816

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ac200108a

关键词

-

资金

  1. Air Force Office of Scientific Research [FA9550-05-1-0365]
  2. NSF [0903675]
  3. Division Of Graduate Education
  4. Direct For Education and Human Resources [0903675] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Herein, we detail the development of a method for the chemical isolation and tandem LC-MS/MS quantification of a targeted subset of internal metabolites from cyanobacteria. We illustrate the selection of target compounds; requirements for and optimization of mass spectral detection channels, screening, and optimization of chromatography; and development of a sampling protocol that seeks to acheieve complete, representative, and stable metabolite extraction on the seconds time scale. Several key factors influencing the separation by reversed-phase ion pairing chromatography, specifically the hydrophobicity of the sample matrix and sensitivity to mobile phase acidity, are identified and resolved. We illustrate this methodology with an example from the autofermentative metabolism in the model cyanobacterium Synechococcus sp. PCC 7002, for which intracellular levels of 25 metabolites were monitored over 48 h, including intermediates in central carbon metabolism together with those involved in the cellular energy charge and redox poise. Upon removal of alternative reductant sinks (nitrate), anoxia induces autofermentation of carbohydrates with a parallel rise in the intracellular pyridine nucleotide redox poise that is specific to NAD(H) and alongside a gradual decline in the adenylate energy charge. This LC-MS/MS-based method provides for accurate time-resolved quantification of multiple metabolites in parallel, thus enabling experimental verification of the active metabolic pathways.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据