4.6 Article

Reconciling the roles of FAK in osteoblast differentiation, osteoclast remodeling, and bone regeneration

期刊

BONE
卷 41, 期 1, 页码 39-51

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2007.01.024

关键词

osteoblasts; focal adhesion kinase (FAK); skeletal regeneration; osteoclasts; Pyk2

资金

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [C06 RR016490, C06-RR16490] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIAMS NIH HHS [R01 AR045989-02, R01 AR45989, R01 AR045989, R01 AR045989-07, R01 AR045989-09, R01 AR045989-06S1, R01 AR045989-08, R01 AR045989-04, R01 AR045989-01A1, R01 AR045989-05, R01 AR045989-03] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIDCR NIH HHS [P60 DE013058, P60 DE013058-020002, P60 DE013058-019002, P60 DE013058-01S19002, R01 DE 012462, R01 DE024000, P60 DE013058-010002, P60 DE13058, P60 DE013058-01S10002, R01 DE012462] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Integrins link the inside of a cell with its outside environment and in doing so regulate a wide variety of cell behaviors. Integrins are well known for their roles in angiogenesis and cell migration but their functions in bone formation are less clear. The majority of integrin signaling proceeds through focal adhesion kinase (FAK), an essential component of the focal adhesion complex. We generated transgenic mice in which FAK was deleted in osteoblasts and uncovered a previously unknown role in osteoblast differentiation associated with bone healing. FAK mutant cells migrated to the site of skeletal injury and angiogenesis was unaffected yet the transgenic mice still exhibited numerous defects in reparative bone formation. Osteoblast differentiation itself was unperturbed by the loss of FAK, whereas the attachment of osteoclasts to the bone matrix was disrupted in vivo. We postulate that defective bi-directional integrin signaling affects the organization of the collagen matrix. Finally, we present a compensatory candidate molecule, Pyk2, which localized to the focal adhesions in osteoblasts that were lacking FAK. (c) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据