4.7 Article

Stress-inducible and constitutive phosphoinositide pools have distinctive fatty acid patterns in Arabidopsis thaliana

期刊

FASEB JOURNAL
卷 21, 期 9, 页码 1958-1967

出版社

FEDERATION AMER SOC EXP BIOL
DOI: 10.1096/fj.06-7887com

关键词

hyperosmotic stress; plant; PtdIns (4,5) P-2 pools; signal transduction

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Function and development of eukaryotic cells require tight control of diverse physiological processes. Numerous cellular processes are regulated by polyphosphoinositides, which interact with protein partners or mediate release of the second messenger, inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (InsP3). Emerging evidence suggests that different regulatory or signaling functions of polyphosphoinositides may be orchestrated by the establishment of distinct subcellular pools; the principles underlying pool-formation are, however, not understood. Arabidopsis plants exhibit transient increases in polyphosphoinositides with hyperosmotic stress, providing a model for comparing constitutive and stress-inducible polyphosphoinositide pools. Using a combination of thin-layer-chromatography and gaschromatography, phospholipids from stressed and nonstressed Arabidopsis plants were analyzed for their associated fatty acids. Under nonstress conditions structural phospholipids and phosphatidylinositol contained 50-70 mol% polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA), whereas polyphosphoinositides were more saturated (10-20 mol% PUFA). With hyperosmotic stress polyphosphoinositides with up to 70 mol% PUFA were formed that differed from constitutive species and coincided with a transient loss in unsaturated phosphatidylinositol. The patterns indicate inducible turnover of an unsaturated phosphatidylinositol pool, which accumulates under standard conditions and is primed for phosphorylation on stimulation. Metabolic analysis of wild-type and transgenic plants disturbed in phosphoinositide metabolism suggests that, in contrast to saturated species, unsaturated polyphosphoinositides are channeled toward InsP3-production.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据