4.6 Article

Chemopreventive effects of lupulone, a hop β-acid, on human colon cancer-derived metastatic SW620 cells and in a rat model of colon carcinogenesis

期刊

CARCINOGENESIS
卷 28, 期 7, 页码 1575-1581

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/carcin/bgm080

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The bitter acids of hops (Humulus lupulus L.) mainly consist of humulones or alpha-acids and lupulones or beta-acids. We aimed to evaluate the antiproliferative mechanisms of lupulones on a human metastatic colon carcinoma-derived cell line (SW620 cells) and to assess their chemopreventive effects in a model of colon carcinogenesis. SW620 cell growth was inhibited by 70% after a 48 h exposure to lupulones (40 mu g/ml). Lupulones up-regulated the expression of Fas receptor (Fas) and Fas ligand (FasL) as well as TNF-related apoptosis inducing ligand (TRAIL)-R1 (DR4) and -R2 (DR5) receptor proteins, suggesting the involvement of Fas and TRAIL receptors-mediated pathways in lupulone-induced apoptosis. Lupulones also increased the mitochondrial membrane permeability. Colon carcinogenesis was initiated in Wistar rats by intra-peritoneal injections of azoxymethane (AOM), once a week for 2 weeks. One week after the last injection, rats received lupulones (0.001 or 0.005%) in drinking water, and AOM-control rats received the excipient. After 7 months of treatment, the colon of rats receiving 0.001 and 0.005% lupulones showed, respectively, a 30 and a 50% reduction (P < 0.05) of the number of preneo-plastic lesions (aberrant crypt foci). In addition, we observed a drastic reduction (70-80%) of the total number of tumors in the colon of rats treated with lupulones when compared with the AOM control group. Lupulones induced apoptosis in SW620 colon-derived metastatic cells by activating both Fas and TRAIL death receptor signaling pathways, and antagonize at a low dose (4 mg/kg/day) colon cancer development. These observations suggest the use of lupulones for colon cancer chemoprevention trials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据