4.8 Article

pH-Dependent Equilibrium Isotope Fractionation Associated with the Compound Specific Nitrogen and Carbon Isotope Analysis of Substituted Anilines by SPME-GC/IRMS

期刊

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 83, 期 5, 页码 1641-1648

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ac102667y

关键词

-

资金

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation [200020-116447/1]
  2. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [200020-116447] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Solid-phase microextraction (SPME) coupled to gas chromatography/isotope ratio mass spectrometry (GC/IRMS) was used to elucidate the effects of N-atom protonation on the analysis of N and C isotope signatures of selected aromatic amines. Precise and accurate isotope ratios were measured using polydimethylsiloxane/divinylbenzene (PDMS/DVB) as the SPME fiber material at solution pH-values that exceeded the pK(a) of the substituted aniline's conjugate acid by two pH-units. Deviations of (delta(15)N and delta(13)C-values from reference measurements by elemental analyzer IRMS were small (<0.9 parts per thousand) and within the typical uncertainties of isotope ratio measurements by SPME-GC/IRMS. Under these conditions, the detection limits for accurate isotope ratio measurements were between 0.64 and 2.1 mg L(-1) for delta(15)N and between 0.13 and 0.54 mg L(-1) for delta(13)C, respectively. Substantial inverse N isotope fractionation was observed by SPME-GC/IRMS as the fraction of protonated species increased with decreasing pH leading to deviations of -20 parts per thousand while the corresponding delta(13)C-values were largely invariant. From isotope ratio analysis at different solution pHs and theoretical calculations by density functional theory, we derived equilibrium isotope effects, EIEs, pertinent to aromatic amine protonation of 0.980 and 1.001 for N and C, respectively, which were very similar for all compounds investigated. Our work shows that N-atom protonation can compromise accurate compound-specific N isotope analysis of aromatic amines.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据