4.8 Article

Impact of DNA-Surface Interactions on the Stability of DNA Hybrids

期刊

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 83, 期 11, 页码 4288-4295

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ac200814y

关键词

-

资金

  1. Research Corporation
  2. Air Force Office of Scientific Research
  3. US-NSF
  4. DFG [63/9-3, 10-1]
  5. European Community [226716]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The structure and stability of single- and double-stranded DNA hybrids immobilized on gold are strongly affected by nucleotide surface interactions. To systematically analyze the effects of these interactions, a set of model DNA hybrids was prepared in conformations that ranged from end-tethered double-stranded to directly adsorbed single-stranded (hairpins) and characterized by surface plasmon resonance (SPR) imaging, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), fluorescence microscopy, and near edge X-ray absorption fine structure (NEXAFS) spectroscopy. The stabilities of these hybrids were evaluated by exposure to a series of stringency rinses in solutions of successively lower ionic strength and by competitive hybridization experiments. In all cases, directly adsorbed DNA hybrids are found to be significantly less stable than either free or end-tethered hybrids. The surface-induced weakening and the associated asymmetry in hybridization responses of the two strands forming hairpin stems are most pronounced for single-stranded hairpins containing blocks of m adenine (A) nucleotides and n thymine (T) nucleotides, which have high and low affinity for gold surfaces, respectively. The results allow a qualitative scale of relative stabilities to be developed for DNA hybrids on surfaces. Additionally, the results suggest a route for selectively weakening portions of immobilized DNA hybrids and for introducing asymmetric hybridization responses by using sequence design to control nucleotide-surface interactions-a strategy that maybe used in advanced biosensors and in switches or other active elements in DNA-based nanotechnology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据