4.4 Review

Rho kinase (ROCK) inhibitors

期刊

JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR PHARMACOLOGY
卷 50, 期 1, 页码 17-24

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/FJC.0b013e318070d1bd

关键词

actin cytoskeleton; Rho GTPase; hypertension; inflarnination; atherosclerosis

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [R01 HL052233-12, R01 HL070274-04, HL052233, R01 HL080187-02, R01 HL052233, R01 HL070274-05, R01 HL080187, R01 HL080187-01A1, R01 HL070274, R01 HL080187-03, R01 HL052233-11] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDDK NIH HHS [R01 DK062729-04, R01 DK062729, R01 DK062729-05] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NINDS NIH HHS [P50 NS010828, F32 NS010828, NS010828, P01 NS010828-330036, P01 NS010828] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Rho kinase (ROCK) isoforms, ROCK1 and ROCK2, were initially discovered as downstream targets of the small GTP-binding protein Rho. Because ROCKs mediate various important cellular functions such as cell shape, motility, secretion, proliferation, and gene expression, it is likely that this pathway will intersect with other signaling pathways known to contribute to cardiovascular disease. Indeed, ROCKs have already been implicated in the regulation of vascular tone, proliferation, inflammation, and oxidative stress. However, it is not entirely clear how ROCKs are regulated, what some of their downstream targets are, and whether ROCK1 and ROCK2 mediate different cellular functions. Clinically, inhibition of ROCK pathway is believed to contribute to some of the cardiovascular benefits of statin therapy that are independent of lipid lowering (ie, pleiotropic effects). To what extent ROCK activity is inhibited in patients on statin therapy is not known, but it may have important clinical implications. Indeed, several pharmaceutical companies are already actively engaged in the development of ROCK inhibitors as the next generation of therapeutic agents for cardiovascular disease because evidence from animal studies suggests the potential involvement of ROCK in hypertension and atherosclerosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据