4.8 Article

Capabilities of MS for Analytical Quantitative Determination of the Ratio of α- and βAsp7 Isoforms of the Amyloid-β Peptide in Binary Mixtures

期刊

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 83, 期 8, 页码 3205-3210

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ac103213j

关键词

-

资金

  1. Russian Academy of Sciences
  2. Russian Foundation of Basic Research [09-04-12130, 09-04-12225, 09-04-00725, 09-03-92500, 07-02-01482, 10-04-13306]
  3. ICGEB [CRP/RUS08-02]
  4. Russian Federal program [02.512.11.2329, 02.512.11.2197, 16.512.11.2081, 16.740. 11.0369, 14.740.11.0755]
  5. Russian Academy of Medical Sciences

向作者/读者索取更多资源

There is strong evidence that the amyloid-P peptide (A beta) plays a crucial role in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease (AD), a lethal neurodegenerative disorder of the elderly. During pathology development, the peptide as well as its various chemically modified isoforms is accumulated the so-called amyloid plaques, which are the pathomorpholo-in specific brain tissues as characteristic proteinaceous deposits, gical mark of AD, although the level of A beta in the blood is the same for healthy individuals and for AD patients. Earlier, it has been shown that isomerization of aspartate 7, the most abundant post translational modification of the A beta peptide, is tightly involved in a set of molecular processes associated with AD progression. Therefore, the isoAsp 7-containing A beta isomer (isoA beta) is assumed to be a potential biomarker of AD that can be identified in the blood. Here, we present an analytical mass spectrometric method for quantitative determination of the ratio of normal and isomerized A beta fragments 1-16 in their binary mixtures, and all analytical capabilities, such as accuracy, detection limits, and sensitivity of the presented method, are determined and thoroughly discussed. On the basis of this method, an analytical approach for quantitative determination of this modification in the blood will be developed in further studies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据