4.6 Article

Auditory cortical detection and discrimination correlates with communicative significance

期刊

PLOS BIOLOGY
卷 5, 期 7, 页码 1426-1439

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0050173

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIDCD NIH HHS [DC08343, DC02260, R01 DC008343-01, R01 DC008343, F32 DC005279, R01 DC002260, F32 DC05279, R01 DC002260-12] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIMH NIH HHS [P50 MH077970, MH077970] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NINDS NIH HHS [P01 NS034835, NS34835] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Plasticity studies suggest that behavioral relevance can change the cortical processing of trained or conditioned sensory stimuli. However, whether this occurs in the context of natural communication, where stimulus significance is acquired through social interaction, has not been well investigated, perhaps because neural responses to species-specific vocalizations can be difficult to interpret within a systematic framework. The ultrasonic communication system between isolated mouse pups and adult females that either do or do not recognize the calls' significance provides an opportunity to explore this issue. We applied an information-based analysis to multi-and single unit data collected from anesthetized mothers and pup-naive females to quantify how the communicative significance of pup calls affects their encoding in the auditory cortex. The timing and magnitude of information that cortical responses convey (at a 2-ms resolution) for pup call detection and discrimination was significantly improved in mothers compared to naive females, most likely because of changes in call frequency encoding. This was not the case for a non-natural sound ensemble outside the mouse vocalization repertoire. The results demonstrate that a sensory cortical change in the timing code for communication sounds is correlated with the vocalizations' behavioral relevance, potentially enhancing functional processing by improving its signal to noise ratio.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据