4.8 Article

Soft Microelectrode Linear Array for Scanning Electrochemical Microscopy

期刊

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 82, 期 24, 页码 10037-10044

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ac1019304

关键词

-

资金

  1. Fonds National Suisse pour la Recherche Scientifique [20PA21_121570/1]
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [Wi 1617/10]
  3. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [20PA21_121570] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A linear array of eight individual addressable microelectrodes has been developed in order to perform high-throughput scanning electrochemical microscopy (SECM) imaging of large sample areas in contact regime. Similar to previous reports, the soft microelectrode array was fabricated by ablating microchannels on a polyethylene terephthalate (PET) film and filling them with carbon ink. Improvements have been achieved by using a 5 mu m thick Parylene coating that allows for smaller working distances, as the probe was mounted with the Parylene coating facing the sample surface. Additionally, the application of a SECM holder allows scanning in contact regime with a tilted probe, reducing the topographic effects and assuring the probe bending direction. The main advantage of the soft microelectrode array is the considerable decrease in the experimental time needed for imaging large sample areas. Additionally, soft microelectrode arrays are very stable and can be used several times, since the electrode surface can be regenerated by blade cutting. Cyclic voltammograms and approach curves were recorded in order to assess the electrochemical properties of the device. An SECM image of a gold on glass chip was obtained with high resolution and sensitivity, proving the feasibility of soft tnicroelectrode arrays to detect localized surface activity. Finite element method (FEM) simulations were performed in order to establish the effect of diffusion layer overlapping between neighboring electrodes on the respective approach curves.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据