4.7 Article

A three-decade analysis of 3,911 small intestinal neuroendocrine tumors: The rapid pace of no progress

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY
卷 102, 期 7, 页码 1464-1473

出版社

BLACKWELL PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01185.x

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [R01-CA-115825] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVES: Small intestinal neuroendocrine tumors (SI-NETs) are the most common gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumor, but their natural history and outcome remain poorly defined, which hinders both the prediction of disease progression and appropriate therapeutic options. We examined patterns, incidence, prognosis, and outcomes of these tumors over a 30- yr period. METHODS: Data were extracted from the NCI's SEER registry ( 1973 - 2002). Incidence rates, distribution, and 5- yr survival rates were analyzed and adjusted ( U. S. decennial census data). RESULTS: Of the 18,641 NETs, 3,911 ( 21.0%) were SI- NETs, of which 1,953 ( 49.6%) were ileal. Since 1973, both SI- NET and its ileal variant have increased annually by 3.8% and 2.1%, respectively. Ileal tumors, as a percentage of SI tumors, have increased from 52% to 63.6%. The age- adjusted incidence of ileal, small intestinal, and digestive system NETs has increased 225%, 460%, and 720% over 30 yr. Ileal tumors have specifically increased in prevalence in white ( 274%) and black ( 500%) men and women ( 213% and 286%, respectively); an overall increase of fourfold in blacks and 2.4- fold in whites. Although 83.3% of SI- NETs were staged, 83.7% were histologically ungraded. Five- year survival rates for SI- NETs were 62.6 +/- 1% ( all stages), 73.8% ( localized), 72% ( regional), and 43.2% ( distant). These have not significantly altered since 1973 ( P = 0.11). CONCLUSIONS: SI- NETs have increased, particularly in men and in the black population, which may be due to in vivo changes, increased clinical and pathological awareness, or increased detection of malignant, diagnosed late, and survival rates have remained unchanged over 30 yr.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据