4.8 Article

Binding of Perfluorocarboxylates to Serum Albumin: A Comparison of Analytical Methods

期刊

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 82, 期 3, 页码 974-981

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ac902238u

关键词

-

资金

  1. U.S. National Science Foundation [0201955, 0216458]
  2. Stanford University's Woods Institute for the Environment
  3. Union College
  4. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys
  5. Directorate For Engineering [0216458, 0201955] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Perfluorochemicals are globally pervasive contaminants that are persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic. Perfluorocarboxylic acids (PFCAs) with 8-13 carbons accumulate in the liver and blood of aquatic organisms; PFCA-protein interactions may explain this accumulation pattern. Here, the interactions between PFCAs with 8-11 carbons and serum albumin are examined using three experimental approaches: surface tension titrations, F-19 NMR spectroscopy, and fluorescence spectroscopy. Surface tension titrations indicate complex formation at high (mM) PFCA concentrations. Secondary association constants ranging from 10(1) to 10(4) M-1 were determined from F-19 NMR titrations at high PFCA: albumin mole ratios. Fluorescence measurements indicate that PFCA-albumin interactions alter the protein conformation at low PFCA:albumin mole ratios (up to 5:1) and suggest two binding classes with association constants around 10(5) and 10(2) M-1. While F-19 NMR and fluorescence provide both qualitative and quantitative information about PFCA-albumin interactions, surface tension provides only qualitative information. Limitations associated with instrumentation and methods require high PFCA concentrations in both surface tension and F-19 NMR experiments; in contrast, fluorescence allows for analysis of a wider range of PFCA concentrations and PFCA:albumin mole ratios. Results from this study indicate that fluorescence, though an indirect method, offers a more comprehensive picture of the nature of PFCA-albumin interactions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据